Observer effect
The observer effect, also known as the Hawthorne effect, occurs when people change their behavior or performance due to the awareness that they are being observed. In a team setting, the observer effect can impact decisions by causing team members to alter their behavior in response to being observed by their colleagues, rather than acting in their normal manner. This can lead to a distortion of results and a lack of authenticity in decision making, as team members may feel pressured to conform to certain expectations or to present themselves in a certain way. To minimize the impact of the observer effect on team decision making, it is important for team members to be aware of the bias and to strive to be authentic and transparent in their actions and communication.
Observer impacts on modern software companies
The observer effect, also known as the Hawthorne effect, is a cognitive bias that occurs when people change their behavior or performance due to the awareness that they are being observed. This effect can have a significant impact on decision making in a modern software company, as it can lead to a distortion of results and a lack of authenticity in decision making.
​
One way that the observer effect can reduce the quality of decisions in a software company is by causing team members to alter their behavior in response to being observed by their colleagues, rather than acting in their normal manner. For example, if a team is being observed by their manager or a client, they may be more likely to present their work in a more favorable light, even if it is not entirely accurate. This can lead to a lack of transparency and honesty in decision making, which can ultimately undermine the quality of the decisions being made.
​
The observer effect can also lead to a lack of creativity and innovation in decision making, as team members may feel pressure to conform to certain expectations or to present themselves in a certain way. This can lead to a narrow-minded approach to problem solving and can ultimately result in suboptimal or even harmful decisions.
​
To minimize the impact of the observer effect on decision making in a software company, it is important to implement techniques that encourage authenticity and transparency. One way to do this is through the use of anonymous voting or decision making processes. By allowing team members to make decisions anonymously, the influence of individual biases can be reduced and team members may feel more comfortable expressing their true opinions and ideas.
​
Another technique that can be used to remedy the observer effect is through the use of structured decision making processes. These processes involve breaking down a decision into smaller steps and explicitly considering a range of options and evidence before making a final choice. By following a structured process, team members can be more deliberate in their decision making and less likely to be swayed by their biases.
​
In addition to these techniques, it is also important for software companies to create a culture of transparency and honesty. This can involve setting clear expectations for team members and encouraging open and honest communication. By creating an environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their true opinions and ideas, the impact of the observer effect can be minimized.
​
Overall, the observer effect can have a negative impact on decision making in a software company, but there are a number of techniques that can be used to remedy the situation. By implementing anonymous voting and structured decision making processes, and creating a culture of transparency and honesty, software companies can help their teams make more informed and authentic decisions.
